Elementary Linear Algebra 7th Edition

Published by Cengage Learning
ISBN 10: 1-13311-087-8
ISBN 13: 978-1-13311-087-3

Appendix - Mathematical Induction and Other Forms of Proofs - Exercises - Page A6: 29

Answer

The statement does not hold for the matrix $A=\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & 2\\ 4 & 4\end{array}\right]$ for example.

Work Step by Step

Consider the following statement: If $A$ is a matrix, then $\det\left(A^{-1}\right)=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\det A}$. We will now present a counterexample in order to show that the statement is false. Let $A=\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & 2\\ 4 & 4\end{array}\right]$. We have that $\det A=0$ which implies that $A$ is not invertible and therefore, $A^{-1}$ does not exist. Thus, the equation $\det\left(A^{-1}\right)=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\det A}$ is not even well-defined for $A$ and therefore, the statement is false. $\textbf{Observation:}$ If in the statement $A$ were required to be invertible then, the statement would be true by a result of Chapter $3$.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.