Calculus 10th Edition

Published by Brooks Cole
ISBN 10: 1-28505-709-0
ISBN 13: 978-1-28505-709-5

Chapter 5 - Logarithmic, Exponential, and Other Transcendental Functions - 5.2 Exercises - Page 336: 104

Answer

$\text{False}$

Work Step by Step

If this were true, then the derivative of the RHS should be the integrand function. The RHS is not an antiderivative of $\ln x:$ $\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx}(\frac{1}{x}+C)=\frac{d}{dx}(x^{-1}+C)=(-1)\cdot x^{-1-1}= -x^{-2},$ which is not $\ln x$, showing that the statement is false.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.