Discrete Mathematics with Applications 4th Edition

Published by Cengage Learning
ISBN 10: 0-49539-132-8
ISBN 13: 978-0-49539-132-6

Chapter 7 - Functions - Exercise Set 7.2 - Page 416: 57

Answer

See explanation

Work Step by Step

Below is a straightforward algorithmic approach to verify **injectivity** (one‐to‐one property) of a function \(f\) whose domain and codomain are both finite. We assume: - The domain is a finite set \(X = \{x_1, x_2, \dots, x_m\}\). - The codomain is some finite set \(Y\) (we do not necessarily need to list out all elements of \(Y\), only to store images \(f(x)\)). - We have access to a “black box” procedure \(\mathrm{Compute}(f,x)\) that returns \(f(x)\) for any \(x \in X\). --- ## Idea of the Algorithm A function \(f\) is injective if **no two distinct inputs** share the same output. Equivalently, as you iterate through the domain, you must never see the same function value more than once. ### Pseudocode ``` Algorithm IsOneToOne(f, X): 1. Create an empty set S to store images of f. 2. For each element x in X (the domain): a. y ← Compute(f, x) // Get the image of x under f b. If y is in S: return "f is NOT one-to-one" // Found a duplicate image Else: Add y to S 3. // If we finish the loop without finding duplicates: return "f IS one-to-one" ``` ### Explanation 1. **Initialize a set \(S\)** to keep track of values already encountered. 2. **Loop** over each element \(x\) in the domain \(X\). 3. **Compute** \(f(x)\). 4. **Check** whether \(f(x)\) has already appeared in \(S\). - If yes, we have found two different inputs \(x_1\neq x_2\) with \(f(x_1)=f(x_2)\), so \(f\) is not injective. - If no, insert \(f(x)\) into \(S\) and move on. 5. **If** we finish processing every \(x\) without finding any duplicate images, then \(f\) is injective. --- ## Complexity - You make **one pass** through all elements of the domain. - Each pass involves: 1. **Computing** \(f(x)\) once, which we assume is handled by an existing procedure. 2. **Checking** membership in \(S\) and inserting if not found. - If you use an efficient data structure (like a hash set) for \(S\), membership check and insertion are effectively \(O(1)\) on average, making the overall algorithm \(O(m)\), where \(m = |X|\). - If you used a simpler data structure (like a list), membership check is \(O(m)\) each time, and overall worst‐case time could be \(O(m^2)\). Either way, for a finite domain, this procedure is finite and guarantees to detect or refute injectivity.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.