Discrete Mathematics with Applications 4th Edition

Published by Cengage Learning
ISBN 10: 0-49539-132-8
ISBN 13: 978-0-49539-132-6

Chapter 5 - Sequences, Mathematical Induction, and Recursion - Exercise Set 5.9 - Page 335: 20

Answer

See explanation

Work Step by Step

Below is a common proof (sometimes called a “backward induction” or “downward induction” proof) that **McCarthy’s 91 function** forces every positive integer \(n \le 101\) to map to \(91\). Recall its definition: \[ M(n) \;=\; \begin{cases} n - 10, & \text{if } n > 100,\\[6pt] M\bigl(M(n+11)\bigr), & \text{if } n \le 100. \end{cases} \] We want to show: \[ \forall\,1 \le n \le 101,\quad M(n) \;=\; 91. \] --- ## **Proof Idea** 1. **If \(n>100\),** then \(M(n)=n-10\). In particular, \(M(101)=101-10=91\). 2. **If \(n \le 100,\)** the definition says \(M(n)=M\bigl(M(n+11)\bigr)\). - If \(n+11>100\), then \(M(n+11)=(n+11)-10=n+1\). - If \(n+11 \le 100\), then we again apply the same rule to \(M(n+11)\). Eventually (as we keep adding 11), we pass 100, and the function peels off 10. Tracing back shows the final value collapses to 91. A succinct way to make this rigorous is by **downward induction** starting from \(n=101\) and working down to \(n=1\). --- ## **Detailed Proof by Downward Induction** ### **Step 1: Base Case** \((n=101)\) Since \(101>100\), the definition gives \[ M(101) \;=\; 101 - 10 \;=\; 91. \] So \(M(101)=91\) holds. ### **Step 2: Inductive Step** We assume for some integer \(k\) with \(1 \le k \le 100\) that \[ \forall m \text{ with } k < m \le 101,\quad M(m)=91. \] We need to prove \(M(k)=91\). Two subcases arise: 1. **Case A:** \(k+11 > 100\). This means \(k \ge 90\). Then \[ M(k) \;=\; M\bigl(M(k+11)\bigr) \;=\; M\bigl((k+11)-10\bigr) \;=\; M(k+1). \] But \(k+1 \le 101\). By the inductive hypothesis (since \(k+1>k\)), we have \(M(k+1)=91\). Hence \[ M(k) = M(k+1) = 91. \] 2. **Case B:** \(k+11 \le 100\). Then \[ M(k) \;=\; M\bigl(M(k+11)\bigr). \] But \(k+11 > k\). By the inductive hypothesis, \(M(k+11)=91\). Thus \[ M(k) \;=\; M(91). \] We already know \(91 \le 101\) and by the same inductive reasoning (or by a direct chain evaluation), \(M(91)=91\). Therefore \[ M(k) = 91. \] In both subcases, \(M(k)=91\). This completes the inductive step. ### **Conclusion** By downward induction, for every \(n\) with \(1 \le n \le 101\), we obtain \(M(n)=91\). Equivalently, \[ \boxed{M(n)=91 \quad\text{for all positive integers } n \le 101.} \] --- ## **Intuitive “Chain” Explanation** Sometimes one sees a more explicit “chain” computation: - Start with \(n \le 100\). Then \(M(n)=M(M(n+11))\). - Repeatedly apply “\(+11\)” until you exceed 100. The first time you exceed 100, say \(n+k\cdot 11>100\), the function value becomes \((n+k\cdot 11)-10\). - That new number is still \(\le 101\), and further applications of \(M(\cdot)\) keep collapsing down until eventually everything maps to 91. Either way, the key takeaway is that **for all \(n\le101\), McCarthy’s 91 function returns 91.** For \(n>101\), of course, \(M(n)=n-10\).
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.