Calculus 10th Edition

Published by Brooks Cole
ISBN 10: 1-28505-709-0
ISBN 13: 978-1-28505-709-5

Chapter 5 - Logarithmic, Exponential, and Other Transcendental Functions - 5.3 Exercises - Page 345: 96

Answer

See explanation

Work Step by Step

Method: Proof by contradiction Hypothesis: Let $g$ and $h$ be two distinct inverses of the function $f(x)$ and $I_x$ be the identity function in x. Proof: So, $(g∘f)(x)=(f∘g)(x)=I_x$ And, $(h∘f)(x)=(f∘h)(x)=I_x$ Therefore, $(f∘g)(x)=(f∘h)(x)$ Composing by left side, $g∘(f∘g)=g∘(f∘h)$ By associativity, we can say that $(g∘f)∘g=(g∘f)∘h$ As $(g∘f)(x)=I_x$. $I_x∘g=I_xoh$ which means that $g(x)=h(x)$ But we assumed they were distinct. Thus our hypothesis isn't self-consistent and leads to contradiction and hence it is proven to be false.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.