Discrete Mathematics with Applications 4th Edition

Published by Cengage Learning
ISBN 10: 0-49539-132-8
ISBN 13: 978-0-49539-132-6

Chapter 5 - Sequences, Mathematical Induction, and Recursion - Exercise Set 5.7 - Page 316: 45

Answer

\[ \boxed{v_k = 3k - 2} \]

Work Step by Step

We have the sequence \(\{v_k\}\) given by \[ \begin{cases} v_1 = 1,\\[4pt] v_k \;=\; v_{\lfloor k/2 \rfloor} \;+\; v_{\lfloor (k+1)/2 \rfloor} \;+\; 2, \quad \text{for all integers } k \ge 2. \end{cases} \] --- ## (a) Use Iteration (Compute First Few Terms) to Guess a Formula Let’s calculate several terms: \(v_1 = 1\) (given). \(v_2 = v_{\lfloor 2/2 \rfloor} + v_{\lfloor 3/2 \rfloor} + 2 = v_1 + v_1 + 2 = 1 + 1 + 2 = 4.\) \(v_3 = v_{\lfloor 3/2 \rfloor} + v_{\lfloor 4/2 \rfloor} + 2 = v_1 + v_2 + 2 = 1 + 4 + 2 = 7.\) \(v_4 = v_{\lfloor 4/2 \rfloor} + v_{\lfloor 5/2 \rfloor} + 2 = v_2 + v_2 + 2 = 4 + 4 + 2 = 10.\) \(v_5 = v_{\lfloor 5/2 \rfloor} + v_{\lfloor 6/2 \rfloor} + 2 = v_2 + v_3 + 2 = 4 + 7 + 2 = 13.\) - \(v_6 = v_{\lfloor 6/2 \rfloor} + v_{\lfloor 7/2 \rfloor} + 2 = v_3 + v_3 + 2 = 7 + 7 + 2 = 16.\) We see a pattern emerging: \[ v_1 = 1,\; v_2 = 4,\; v_3 = 7,\; v_4 = 10,\; v_5 = 13,\; v_6 = 16,\; \dots \] It appears each term increases by 3 from the previous term, starting from \(v_1 = 1\). This suggests an **arithmetic sequence** with common difference 3. Checking closely: \[ v_k \;=\; 3k \;-\; 2. \] Indeed: - For \(k=1\): \(3(1)-2=1.\) - For \(k=2\): \(3(2)-2=6-2=4.\) - For \(k=3\): \(3(3)-2=9-2=7.\) - etc. Hence we **guess** that \[ \boxed{v_k = 3k - 2}. \] --- ## (b) Verify the Formula by Strong (or Simple) Induction We now prove that \(v_k = 3k - 2\) satisfies both the initial condition and the recursive relation. ### Base Case For \(k=1\), our formula gives \[ v_1 = 3(1) - 2 = 1, \] which matches the given \(v_1 = 1\). So the base case holds. ### Inductive Step Assume that for **all** integers \(j\) with \(1 \le j < k\), we have \(v_j = 3j - 2\). We must show \(v_k = 3k - 2\). From the recurrence: \[ v_k = v_{\lfloor k/2 \rfloor} + v_{\lfloor (k+1)/2 \rfloor} + 2. \] By the inductive hypothesis: \[ v_{\lfloor k/2 \rfloor} = 3\,\lfloor k/2 \rfloor - 2, \quad v_{\lfloor (k+1)/2 \rfloor} = 3\,\lfloor (k+1)/2 \rfloor - 2. \] Hence, \[ v_k = \bigl[3\,\lfloor k/2 \rfloor - 2\bigr] + \bigl[3\,\lfloor (k+1)/2 \rfloor - 2\bigr] + 2. \] Combine like terms: \[ v_k = 3\,\lfloor k/2 \rfloor + 3\,\lfloor (k+1)/2 \rfloor \;-\; 2 \;-\; 2 \;+\; 2 = 3\,\Bigl[\lfloor k/2 \rfloor + \lfloor (k+1)/2 \rfloor\Bigr] \;-\; 2. \] It is a known fact (easy to check for even/odd \(k\)) that \[ \lfloor k/2 \rfloor \;+\; \lfloor (k+1)/2 \rfloor \;=\; k. \] Thus, \[ v_k = 3\,k - 2. \] This completes the inductive step. **Conclusion:** By the principle of mathematical induction, \(v_k = 3k - 2\) for all integers \(k \ge 1\).
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.