Discrete Mathematics with Applications 4th Edition

Published by Cengage Learning
ISBN 10: 0-49539-132-8
ISBN 13: 978-0-49539-132-6

Chapter 5 - Sequences, Mathematical Induction, and Recursion - Exercise Set 5.7 - Page 316: 30

Answer

See explanation

Work Step by Step

We wish to prove by mathematical induction that for all integers \( k \ge 1 \) the sequence defined by \[ f_1 = 1 \quad \text{and} \quad f_k = f_{k-1} + 2^k \quad \text{for } k\ge2, \] has the explicit formula \[ \boxed{f_k = 2^{k+1} - 3.} \] --- ### **Base Case** \((k = 1)\) For \(k = 1\), the formula gives \[ f_1 = 2^{1+1} - 3 = 2^2 - 3 = 4 - 3 = 1. \] This agrees with the given initial condition \(f_1 = 1\). --- ### **Inductive Step** **Inductive Hypothesis:** Assume that for some integer \( k \ge 1 \) the formula holds; that is, assume \[ f_k = 2^{k+1} - 3. \] **To Prove:** Show that \[ f_{k+1} = 2^{(k+1)+1} - 3 = 2^{k+2} - 3. \] **Proof:** Starting with the recursive definition, \[ f_{k+1} = f_k + 2^{k+1}. \] By the inductive hypothesis, substitute \( f_k = 2^{k+1} - 3 \): \[ f_{k+1} = \bigl(2^{k+1} - 3\bigr) + 2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^{k+1} - 3 = 2^{k+2} - 3. \] This is exactly the formula for \(f_{k+1}\).
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.