Finite Math and Applied Calculus (6th Edition)

Published by Brooks Cole
ISBN 10: 1133607705
ISBN 13: 978-1-13360-770-0

Chapter 10 - Section 10.3 - Limits and Continuity: Algebraic Viewpoint - Exercises - Page 721: 105

Answer

The statement is not always true (for piecewise defined functions with a discontinuity, for example). Changing "specified algebraically" with "a closed function" would produce a correct statement.

Work Step by Step

Piecewise functions are also specified algebraically. For example, $f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{lll} -1, & for & x\lt 2\\ +1 & for & x \geq 2 \end{array}\right.$ is defined on all of $\mathbb{R}$, but the one-sided limits at $x=2$ differ, which means that no limit exists there. Thus, $f$ is discontinuous at x=2. The statement would be correct if it was about closed functions. They are continuous at every point on their domains.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.