- ^ Lloyd, Genevieve (2002) [1996]. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Spinoza and the Ethics. London, England: Routledge. p. 24. ASIN B0B7QH99WF.
- ^ Part 3, proposition 55.
- ^ Part 4, proposition 67.
- ^ Part 5, proposition 23.
- ^ Part 1, Proposition 5
- ^ Part 1, Proposition 8
- ^ Part 1, Proposition 14
- ^ Deleuze, Gilles (1988) [1970]. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. Translated by Hurley, Robert. San Francisco, California: City Lights Books. pp. 58, 59, 62, 97. ISBN 978-0-87286-218-0. Conatus. Cf. Power. Desire. Cf. Consciousness, Power [...] all power is inseparable from a capacity for being affected
- ^ Spinoza, Benedict (1994). Curley, Edwin (ed.). A Spinoza Reader: the Ethcs and other works. Translated by Curley, Edwin. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 201. ISBN 0-691-00067-0.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av Spinoza, Benedict (1994). Curley, Edwin (ed.). A Spinoza Reader: the Ethcs and other works. Translated by Curley, Edwin. Princeton University Press. pp. 189–196. ISBN 0-691-00067-0.
- ^ Miller, Ian S. (2022). Clinical Spinoza: Integrating His Philosophy with Contemporary Therapeutic Practice. Psychoanalysis in a New Key Book Series. Routledge. p. 239. doi:10.4324/9781003246404-11. ISBN 978-1-032-15934-8.
- ^ Letter XXI (Van Vloten LXXIII)
- ^ "The supposition of some, that I endeavor to prove in the Tractatus Theologico–Politicus the unity of God and Nature (meaning by the latter a certain mass or corporeal matter), is wholly erroneous."
- ^ "Having established that Nature is an indivisible, infinite, uncaused, substantial whole—in fact, the only substantial whole; that outside of Nature there is nothing; and that everything that exists is a part of Nature and is brought into being by and within Nature with a deterministic necessity through Nature's laws," Spinoza concludes that "God and Nature—the substantial, unique, unified, active, infinitely powerful, necessary cause of everything—are one and the same thing." (A Book Forged in Hell, Steven Nadler, ch.4 [the page number should also be added])
- ^ Twice in Part IV, Preface (Deum seu Naturam, Deus seu Natura); twice in Part IV, Proposition IV, Proof (Dei sive Naturæ, Dei seu Naturæ).
- ^ Cf. Steven Nadler, A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza's Scandalous Treatise, Princeton University Press, 2011, ch. 5.
- ^ a b Cf. "Introduction to Spinoza's Ethics" Archived 2015-02-26 at the Wayback Machine, by Geoff Pynn, Northern Illinois University, Spring 2012.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Pringle-Pattison, Andrew Seth (1911). "Spinoza, Baruch" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 20 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 687–691.
- ^ See also "Spinoza's Modal Metaphysics", on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, cit., publ. 21/08/2007.
- ^ See also A. Wolf's, "Spinoza, the Man and His Thought", 1933; Antonio Damasio, Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain, William Heinemann, 2003, esp. ch. 6, 224–261; Richard McKeon, The Philosophy of Spinoza: The Unity of His Thought, Ox Bow Pr., 1928; Ray Monk & Frederic Raphael, The Great Philosophers. Phoenix, 2000, s.v. "Spinoza", pp. 135–174. See also the very useful Olli Koistinen (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics, Cambridge University Press, 2009, esp. ch. 7, by Diane Steinberg, pp. 140–166.
- ^ a b c d e f Especially valuable for these specific sections of Spinoza's thought as expounded in his Ethics, have been the online pages by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy at these four links [1], [2], [3], [4] — which respectively represent an interpretation and commentary of the philosopher's stance on "Modal Metaphysics", "Theory of Attributes", "Psychological Theory", "Physical Theory", and are currently cited as a reference within the present text.
- ^ See also The Short Treatise on God, Man and his Well-being, London: A. & C. Black, 2006 – scanned, University of Toronto, Internet Archive.
- ^ Cf. Marcello Colitti, Etica e politica di Baruch Spinoza, Aliberti, 2010, esp. s.v. "Etica". (in Italian)
- ^ For this and other affirmations about Spinoza's "psychology", cf. esp. "Spinoza's Psychological Theory", on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, cit., rev. 09/08/2010.
- ^ Cf. Frédéric Manzini, Spinoza, Points, 2010, esp. Pt. 2, pp. 227–306; Pt. 3, pp. 489–550. (in French)
- ^ Cf. also The correspondence of Spinoza, G. Allen & Unwin ltd., 1928, p. 289. See also John Laird, Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 3, No. 12 (Oct., 1928), pp. 544–545.
- ^ See: Jonathan Israel, “The Banning of Spinoza's Works in the Dutch Republic (1670–1678)”, in: Wiep van Bunge and Wim Klever (eds.) Disguised and Overt Spinozism around 1700 (Leiden, 1996), 3-14 (online).
- ^ See for example Boehm, Omri. 2014. Kant's Critique of Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press.
- ^ publ. Loman en Funke, The Hague, 1895
- ^ publ. Van Looy, Amsterdam, 1896
- ^ Letter VIII
- ^ TROMPETTER, LINDA (January 1981). "Spinoza: A Response to De Vries". Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 11 (3): 525–537. doi:10.1080/00455091.1981.10716319. ISSN 0045-5091. S2CID 171006804.
- ^ Letter IX
- ^ Martens, Stanley C. (January 1978). "Spinoza on attributes". Synthese. 37 (1): 107–111. doi:10.1007/bf00869442. ISSN 0039-7857. S2CID 46971533.
- ^ Parerga and Paralipomena, vol. I, "Sketch of a History of the Doctrine of the Ideal and the Real", p. 13
- ^ Parerga and Paralipomena, vol. I, "Fragments for the History of Philosophy", § 12, p. 76
This content is from Wikipedia. GradeSaver is providing this content as a courtesy until we can offer a professionally written study guide by one of our staff editors. We do not consider this content professional or citable. Please use your discretion when relying on it.
