In Book 3, Part 3 Chapter 1 Tolstoy writes: “To study the laws of history we must completely change the subject of our observation, must leave aside kings, ministers, and generals, and study the common, infinitesimally small elements by which the masses are moved.” What are examples so far in the narrative that illustrate Tolstoy’s point that the movement of masses are more important than the decisions of kings, ministers and generals? Are there counter examples that illustrate how the decisions of leaders are indeed significant? If they don’t have the power to direct events, why do you think history focuses so much on the actions of “great men?”
In book 3 part 2 Tolstoy...
Join Now to View Premium Content
GradeSaver provides access to 1749 study guide PDFs and quizzes, 10803 literature essays, 2704 sample college application essays, 663 lesson plans, and ad-free surfing in this premium content, “Members Only” section of the site! Membership includes a 10% discount on all editing orders.