Physics for Scientists and Engineers: A Strategic Approach with Modern Physics (3rd Edition)

Published by Pearson
ISBN 10: 0321740904
ISBN 13: 978-0-32174-090-8

Chapter 40 - One-Dimensional Quantum Mechanics - Conceptual Questions - Page 1212: 4

Answer

$\eta_a = \eta_b\gt \eta_c$

Work Step by Step

We know that the penetration distance is given by $$\eta=\dfrac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2m(U_0-E)}}$$ So the larger the difference $ U_0 - E $, the smaller the penetration distance. $\underline{\text{Analyzing Each Case}}$ $\underline{\text{Figure (a):}}$ $ U_0 = 10 \; \rm {eV} $, $ E = 5 \; \rm {eV} $, so the difference $U_0 - E = 10 - 5 = 5 \; \rm {eV} $. Therefore, $$ \eta_a = \dfrac{\hbar}{\sqrt{10\;m}}\tag 1 $$ $\underline{\text{Figure (b):}}$ $ U_0 = 10 \; \rm {eV} $, $ E = 5 \; \rm {eV} $, so the difference $U_0 - E = 10 - 5 = 5 \; \rm {eV} $. Therefore, $$ \eta_b = \dfrac{\hbar}{\sqrt{10\;m}} \tag 2$$ Thus, from (1) and (2), $$\eta_a=\eta_b$$ $\underline{\text{Figure (c):}}$ $ U_0 = 16\; \rm {eV} $, $ E = 10\; \rm {eV} $, so the difference $U_0 - E = 16- 10= 6\; \rm {eV} $. Therefore, $$ \eta_c = \dfrac{\hbar}{\sqrt{12\;m}}\tag 3 $$ From (1), (2), (3); $$ \boxed{\eta_a = \eta_b\gt \eta_c} $$
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.