Statistics: Informed Decisions Using Data (4th Edition)

Published by Pearson
ISBN 10: 0321757270
ISBN 13: 978-0-32175-727-2

Chapter 12 - Section 12.2 - Consumer Reports - Dirty Birds? - Page 613: d

Answer

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to conclude that Brand A is cleaner than brand D.

Work Step by Step

$n_1~and~p_1$ refer to brand A and $n_2~and~p_2$ refer to brand D. $H_0:~p̂ _1=p̂ _2$ versus $H_1:~p̂ _1\lt p̂ _2$ $p̂ _1=0.04$ and $p̂ _2=0.07$ $p̂ =\frac{x_1+x_2}{n_1+n_2}=\frac{8+14}{200+200}=0.055$ $z_0=\frac{p̂_1-p̂ _2}{\sqrt {p̂ (1-p̂ )}\sqrt {\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}}=\frac{0.04-0.07}{\sqrt {0.055(1-0.055)}\sqrt {\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{200}}}=-1.32$ Left-tailed test: Level of significance: $α=0.05$ $z_α=z_{0.05}$ If the area of the standard normal curve to the right of $z_{0.05}$ is 0.05, then the area of the standard normal curve to the left of $z_{0.05}$ is $1−0.05=0.95$ According to Table V, there are 2 z-scores which give the closest value to 0.95: 1.64 and 1.65. So, let's find the mean of these z-scores: $\frac{1.64+1.65}{2}=1.645$ Also, $-z_α=-z_{0.05}=-1.645$ Since $z_0\gt -z_α$, we do not reject the null hypothesis.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.