Discrete Mathematics with Applications 4th Edition

Published by Cengage Learning
ISBN 10: 0-49539-132-8
ISBN 13: 978-0-49539-132-6

Chapter 5 - Sequences, Mathematical Induction, and Recursion - Exercise Set 5.4 - Page 277: 11

Answer

- Each time you join two blocks (no matter their sizes), you reduce the total number of separate blocks by exactly 1. - You start with \(n\) separate pieces (so \(n\) separate “blocks”). - To end with exactly 1 block, you must perform exactly \(n-1\) joins. - The puzzle’s rules ensure you always join two existing blocks at each step (rather than, say, adding one piece at a time), but that does not change the fact that each step reduces the number of blocks by exactly 1. Hence the total number of “fitting” steps required is \(n - 1\).

Work Step by Step

Below is a typical strong‐induction argument that shows exactly \(n-1\) “fitting steps” are needed to assemble \(n\) jigsaw puzzle pieces into one complete block. --- ## Statement > **Claim.** For a jigsaw puzzle with \(n\) pieces, if you start by joining two matching pieces into a single block and then, at each subsequent step, join two previously assembled blocks (each consisting of one or more pieces), the total number of steps required to end up with a single block of all \(n\) pieces is \(n - 1\). --- ## Proof by Strong Induction **Base Case(s).** 1. **\(n=1\)**: There is only one piece, so there is nothing to “fit together.” The number of steps required is \(0\), and \(0 = 1 - 1\). 2. **\(n=2\)**: You simply match the two pieces. That is exactly 1 step, which equals \(2 - 1\). Thus the statement holds for \(n=1\) and \(n=2\). --- **Inductive Hypothesis.** Assume for some integer \(n \ge 2\) that **for every integer \(k\) with \(1 \le k \le n\)**, any jigsaw puzzle of \(k\) pieces can be assembled into a single block in \(k - 1\) steps (under the described rules). We must prove it for \((n+1)\) pieces. --- **Inductive Step: Case of \((n+1)\) Pieces.** 1. **Partition the \((n+1)\) pieces into two groups.** In the process of assembling, at some step you join two blocks, one of size \(i\) (containing \(i\) pieces) and one of size \((n+1-i)\) (containing the other pieces). - By the strong inductive hypothesis, the \(i\)‐piece block can be formed in \(i-1\) steps. - Similarly, the \((n+1-i)\)‐piece block can be formed in \((n+1-i) - 1 = n - i\) steps. 2. **Join the two blocks.** After these two blocks are formed (in a total of \((i - 1) + (n - i) = n - 1\) steps), you perform **one more step** to fit these two blocks together into a single block of size \((n+1)\). 3. **Total step count.** The total number of steps is \[ \underbrace{(i-1)}_{\text{to assemble block of size }i} \;+\; \underbrace{(n - i)}_{\text{to assemble block of size }(n+1 - i)} \;+\; \underbrace{1}_{\text{to join these two blocks}} \;=\; n. \] But we need exactly \(n\) steps to form \((n+1)\) pieces into one block, i.e., \((n+1)-1\). Notice \(n = (n+1) - 1\). So indeed, it takes \((n+1) - 1\) steps. Thus, by strong induction, any jigsaw puzzle of \(n\) pieces can be assembled in exactly \(n - 1\) steps.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.