Motif analisis of Doublethink

- Describe Doublethink and how he appears throughout the novel (embed quote)

- explain what this motif represents about totalitarian societies, also explain what impact it has on the citizens and how it services the obectives of the party.

- how are the readers positioned to think about this motif and how it connects with the real life totalitarian regimes

- explain how this motif proves George Orwell's views regarding totalitarian regimes and what they are all about


The idea of “doublethink” emerges as an important consequence of the Party’s massive campaign of large-scale psychological manipulation. Simply put, doublethink is the ability to hold two contradictory ideas in one’s mind at the same time. As the Party’s mind-control techniques break down an individual’s capacity for independent thought, it becomes possible for that individual to believe anything that the Party tells them, even while possessing information that runs counter to what they are being told. At the Hate Week rally, for instance, the Party shifts its diplomatic allegiance, so the nation it has been at war with suddenly becomes its ally, and its former ally becomes its new enemy. When the Party speaker suddenly changes the nation he refers to as an enemy in the middle of his speech, the crowd accepts his words immediately, and is ashamed to find that it has made the wrong signs for the event. In the same way, people are able to accept the Party ministries’ names, though they contradict their functions: the Ministry of Plenty oversees economic shortages, the Ministry of Peace wages war, the Ministry of Truth conducts propaganda and historical revisionism, and the Ministry of Love is the center of the Party’s operations of torture and punishment.

Asked by
Last updated by Aslan
Answers 1
Add Yours

Doublethink is essentially reality control. It is the e power to hold two completely contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accept both of them. Even though many people are aware of the facts and of history, they choose to believe an alternate version of reality. People in 1984 celebrate higher chocolate rations even though their chocolate rations are even lower than before. Orwell's idea is prophetically relevant today in American politics. A small crowd at a gathering, for example, at an event is later interpreted as a massive crowd because somebody important says it was.