12 Angry Men

How does juror #3 contradicted himself in act two?

I'm doing an online assignment on 12 angry men, and one of the questions is "How does juror #3 contradicted himself?" I would greatly appreciate it if someone could help me answer this.

Asked by
Last updated by Aslan
Answers 1
Add Yours

Juror 3 contradicts himself by using specifics when it strengthens his case, proving the defendant to be guilty "he said 20 seconds", while speaking in generalizations when it does not help his case, "how does he know how long 15 seconds is?"