Critique of Pure Reason

References

Note: The A and B designations refer to the page numbers of the first (1781) and second (1787) German editions, respectively. Sometimes NKS numbers are used to refer to pages of the Norman Kemp Smith English translation (St. Martin's Press, Macmillan, 1929).

  1. ^ "Seite:Kant Critik der reinen Vernunft 856.png – Wikisource". de.wikisource.org.
  2. ^ Kant 1999, p. A2/B2.
  3. ^ Kant 1999, p. B4.
  4. ^ Kant 1999, Introduction, Part IV, p. A6/B10.
  5. ^ Kant 1999, pp. A6–7/B10–11.
  6. ^ Kant 1999, p. B12.
  7. ^ a b Kant 1999, p. B20.
  8. ^ a b Leibniz, G. W. (1996). New Essays on Human Understanding. Translated and edited by Remnant and Bennett. Cambridge University Press. p. 361. ISBN 0-521-57660-1.
  9. ^ Russell, Bertrand (2008). The Problems of Philosophy. Arc Manor LLC. pp. 56–57. ISBN 978-1-60450-085-1.
  10. ^ "Kant and Hume on Causality". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Layourmomgayb, Stanford University. 2018.
  11. ^ a b Russell, Bertrand (1990). The Problems of Philosophy. Hackett Publishing Company. p. 57. ISBN 0-87220-099-X.
  12. ^ Joad, C.E.M. (1957). Guide to Philosophy. Dover Publications Inc. p. 361. ISBN 978-0-486-20297-6.
  13. ^ Charles George Herbermann; et al. (eds.). The Catholic encyclopedia. Vol. 10. p. 232.
  14. ^ Watson, John (1908). The philosophy of Kant explained. J. Maclehose. pp. 62–72. ISBN 0-8240-2335-8. Kant synthetic judgment a priori.
  15. ^ Makkreel, Rudolf A. (1995). Imagination and Interpretation in Kant. University of Chicago Press. p. 21. ISBN 0-226-50277-5.
  16. ^ Chadwick, Ruth F.; Cazeaux, Clive (1992). Immanuel Kant, Critical Assessments: Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Routledge. p. 43. ISBN 0-415-07411-8.
  17. ^ Angeles, Peter A. (1992). Eugene Ehrlich (ed.). The Harper Collins Dictionary of Philosophy. Harper Collins. p. 149. ISBN 0-06-461026-8.
  18. ^ Solomon, Robert C. (2001). From Rationalism to Existentialism. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 21. ISBN 0-7425-1241-X. In the Transcendental Deduction, Kant distinguishes the transcendental ego from the empirical ego and maintains that only the transcendental ego has these a priori relations with experience.
  19. ^ Caygill 1995, p. 146
  20. ^ a b c Kant 1999, p. A21/B36.
  21. ^ Kant 1999, p. A22.
  22. ^ Kant 1999, p. A19/B33.
  23. ^ a b Kant 1999, p. A20/B34.
  24. ^ Kant 1999, p. A15/B29.
  25. ^ Kant 1999, p. A21/B35.
  26. ^ Kant 1999, p. A16/B30.
  27. ^ Allison, Henry E. (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-3001-0266-6.
  28. ^ Robert Maynard Hutchins, ed. (1952). Great Books of the Western World. Vol. 42. William Benton/Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. p. 24. LCCN 55-10348.
  29. ^ a b c d Sebastian Gardner (1999). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. ISBN 0-415-11909-X.
  30. ^ Senderowics, Yaron M. (2005). The Coherence of Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Springer. p. 270. ISBN 978-1-4020-2581-5. The problem addressed by Kant presupposes the results of the Transcendental Aesthetics.
  31. ^ Laird, John (2010) [1917]. Problems of the Self. Forgotten Books. p. 331. ISBN 978-1-4400-8391-4. ... Kant hunts the paralogism which attempts to prove the existence of spiritual substance...
  32. ^ Dennis Schulting, Jacco Verburgt (eds.), Kant's Idealism: New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine, Springer 2010, p. 203.
  33. ^ Daniel Breazeale; Tom Rockmore, eds. (2010). Fichte, German Idealism, and Early Romanticism. Rodopi. p. 20.
  34. ^ Tom Rockmore (2003). Before and After Hegel: A Historical Introduction to Hegel's Thought. Hackett Publishing. p. xviii. Hegel follows Kant ... in limiting claims to know to the empirically real. In short, he adopts a view very similar to Kant's empirical realism.
  35. ^ Chadwick & Cazeaux 1992, p. 104. "... the self is an intrinsically important topic and absolutely central to Kant's philosophy ..."
  36. ^ Kant 1999, p. A51/B75.
  37. ^ Kant 1999, p. A63/B87.
  38. ^ Kant 1999, p. A63/B88.
  39. ^ Svare, Helge (2006). Body and Practice in Kant. Springer. p. 263. ISBN 1-4020-4118-7. Thus, like logic in general, transcendental logic is the result of a process of abstraction in which something originally part of a more comprehensive context is isolated and then examined in this isolated state.
  40. ^ a b Kant 1999, pp. 8–9.
  41. ^ Kant 1999, p. A70/B95.
  42. ^ Kant 1999, p. A80/B106.
  43. ^ Roy Wood Sellars (1917). The essentials of philosophy. The Macmillan Co. p. 83. kant categories.
  44. ^ Howell, Robert (1992). Kant's Transcendental Deduction. Springer. p. 25. ISBN 0-7923-1571-5. The basic strand of his argument runs as follows.
  45. ^ Heidegger, Martin (1997). Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Indiana University Press. p. 292. ISBN 0-253-33258-3. In the schematism Kant attempts to grasp the synthesis a priori of the productive power of imagination in a unified and original manner.
  46. ^ Hartnack, Justus (2001). Kant's Theory of Knowledge: An Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. Hackett Publishing. p. 87. ISBN 0-87220-506-1.
  47. ^ Wood, Allen W. (2005). Kant. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 84. ISBN 0-631-23282-6. ... Ideas are such that no sensible intuition corresponding to them could ever be given in our experience.
  48. ^ Wood, Allen W. (2001). Kant. p. 84. ISBN 0-375-75733-3. ... Our faculty of reason, when it functions properly, makes us subject to certain conceptual illusions or sophistical lines of reasoning...
  49. ^ Atkins, Kim, ed. (2005). Self and Subjectivity. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 48. ISBN 1-4051-1204-2. Our understanding and experiences are limited a priori to the modes of representation enabled by the categories. Importantly the categories only produce knowledge (or experience, that is, empirical concepts) when they are applied to intuitions. It is this principle that runs through all of Kant's arguments in the Paralogisms of Pure Reason.
  50. ^ Atkins 2005, p. 49.
  51. ^ Atkins 2005, pp. 49–50.
  52. ^ Powell, C. Thomas (1990). Kant's Theory of Self-Consciousness. Oxford University Press. pp. 174, 185, 188. ISBN 0-19-824448-7. The Fourth Paralogism is, in a sense, something of a stepchild, either passed in silence or given minimal treatment in any discussion of the Paralogisms proper.
  53. ^ Beiser, Frederick C. (2002). German Idealism: the struggle against subjectivism, 1781–1801. Harvard University Press. p. 63. ISBN 0-674-00769-7. For Kant, the great value of skeptical idealism is that it demands some proof or reason for our ordinary beliefs.
  54. ^ Bennett, Jonathan Francis (1974). Kant's Dialectics. CUP Archive. p. 72. ISBN 0-521-09849-1. Since the fourth paralogism is misplaced, I shall say no more about it.
  55. ^ Pittman, John (1997). African-American Perspectives and Philosophical Traditions. Routledge. pp. 188–189. ISBN 0-415-91639-9. The neglect of contemporary ethicists of Kant's first Critique has been particularly unfortunate.
  56. ^ Sorensen, Roy A. (2003). A Brief History of the Paradox: philosophy and the labyrinths of the mind. Oxford University Press US. p. 287. ISBN 0-19-515903-9.
  57. ^ Sorensen 2003, p. 294.
  58. ^ Allison 2004, p. 397.
  59. ^ Heidegger, Martin (1988). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Indiana University Press. p. 30. ISBN 0-253-20478-X. A peculiar feature of this proof is that it tries to infer God's existence from his concept. The philosophical science which in Kant's opinion starts purely from concepts... is ontology... That is why Kant calls this proof... the ontological proof.
  60. ^ McGrath, Alister E. (2006). The Christian Theology Reader. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 35. ISBN 1-4051-5358-X. Now "Being" is clearly not a genuine predicate: that is, it is not a concept of something which could be added to the concept of a thing. It is merely the positing of a thing, or of certain determinations, as existing in themselves.
  61. ^ Byrne, Peter (2007). Kant on God. Ashgate Publishing Ltd. pp. 32–36. ISBN 978-0-7546-4023-3.
  62. ^ Caygill 1995, p. 391
  63. ^ Ewald, William Bragg (2008). From Kant to Hilbert: a source book in the foundations of mathematics. Oxford University Press US. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-19-850535-8.
  64. ^ a b Watkins 2005, p. 375
  65. ^ Watkins 2005, p. 376
  66. ^ Watkins 2005, p. 378
  67. ^ Caygill 1995, p. 98
  68. ^ Caygill 1995, pp. 98–99
  69. ^ Caygill 1995, p. 144
  70. ^ Caygill 1995, p. 110
  71. ^ Caygill 1995, p. 292
  72. ^ Copleston 1994, p. 183.
  73. ^ Beiser 1987, p. 4.
  74. ^ Beiser 1987, pp. 172–173.
  75. ^ Beiser 1987, pp. 173–178.
  76. ^ Beiser 1987, pp. 179, 181–182.
  77. ^ Beiser 1987, pp. 181, 184, 186–189.
  78. ^ Beiser 1987, pp. 193–195, 197–198.
  79. ^ Graham Bird (2005). Ted Honderich (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 470. ISBN 0-19-926479-1.
  80. ^ Caygill 1995, p. 149
  81. ^ Smith, Homer W. (1952). Man and His Gods. New York: Grosset & Dunlap. pp. 405–6.

This content is from Wikipedia. GradeSaver is providing this content as a courtesy until we can offer a professionally written study guide by one of our staff editors. We do not consider this content professional or citable. Please use your discretion when relying on it.