The Political Writings of John Locke

References

Notes

  1. ^ Kenyon (1977) adds: "Any unbiassed study of the position shows in fact that it was Filmer, not Hobbes, Locke or Sidney, who was the most influential thinker of the age" (p. 63).

Citations

  1. ^ Fumerton, Richard (2000). "Foundationalist Theories of Epistemic Justification". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 19 August 2018.
  2. ^ David Bostock (2009). Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 43. All of Descartes, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume supposed that mathematics is a theory of our ideas, but none of them offered any argument for this conceptualist claim, and apparently took it to be uncontroversial.
  3. ^ John W. Yolton (2000). Realism and Appearances: An Essay in Ontology. Cambridge University Press. p. 136.
  4. ^ "The Correspondence Theory of Truth". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2018.
  5. ^ Grigoris Antoniou; John Slaney, eds. (1998). Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. p. 9.
  6. ^ Vere Claiborne Chappell, ed. (1994). The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Cambridge University Press. p. 56.
  7. ^ a b Uzgalis, William (1 May 2018) [September 2, 2001]. "John Locke". In E. N. Zalta (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 24 April 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  8. ^ Hansen, Hans V.; Pinto, Robert C., eds. (1995). Fallacies: classical and contemporary readings. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 978-0-271-01416-6. OCLC 30624864.
  9. ^ Locke, John (1690). "Book IV, Chapter XVII: Of Reason". An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  10. ^ Locke, John (1690). Two Treatises of Government (10th ed.): Chapter II, Section 6. Project Gutenberg. Archived from the original on 16 November 2019. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
  11. ^ Hirschmann, Nancy J. (2009). Gender, Class, and Freedom in Modern Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 79.
  12. ^ Sharma, Urmila; S. K. Sharma (2006). Western Political Thought. Washington: Atlantic Publishers. p. 440.
  13. ^ Korab-Karpowicz, W. Julian (2010). A History of Political Philosophy: From Thucydides to Locke. New York: Global Scholarly Publications. p. 291.
  14. ^ Becker, Carl Lotus (1922). The Declaration of Independence: a Study in the History of Political Ideas. New York: Harcourt, Brace. p. 27.
  15. ^ "Foreword and study guide to" John Locke's Two Treatises on Government: A Translation into Modern English, ISR Publications, 2013, p. ii. ISBN 978-0906321690
  16. ^ Baird, Forrest E.; Walter Kaufmann (2008). From Plato to Derrida. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp. 527–529. ISBN 978-0-13-158591-1.
  17. ^ Broad, C. D. (2000). Ethics And the History of Philosophy. UK: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-22530-4.
  18. ^ Roger Woolhouse (2007). Locke: A Biography. Cambridge University Press. p. 116.
  19. ^ Uzgalis, William (2022), "John Locke", in Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 7 March 2024
  20. ^ Henning, Basil Duke (1983), The House of Commons, 1660–1690, vol. 1, Boydell & Brewer, ISBN 978-0-436-19274-6, retrieved 28 August 2012
  21. ^ Laslett 1988, III. Two Treatises of Government and the Revolution of 1688.
  22. ^ Rebecca Newberger Goldstein (2006). Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity. New York: Schocken Books. pp. 260–261.
  23. ^ Rogers, Graham A. J. "John Locke". Britannica Online. Archived from the original on 19 July 2017. Retrieved 3 September 2019.
  24. ^ Express, Britain. "Christ Church Cathedral, Oxford, History & Photos | Historic Oxford Guide". Britain Express.
  25. ^ Hoppit, Julian (2000). A Land of Liberty? England. 1689–1727. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 195.
  26. ^ a b Kenyon, John (1977). Revolution Principles: The Politics of Party. 1689–1720. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. ^ Milton, John R. (2008) [2004]. "Locke, John (1632–1704)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/16885. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  28. ^ "The Three Greatest Men". American Treasures of the Library of Congress. Library of Congress. August 2007. Archived from the original on 20 June 2018. Retrieved 27 June 2018. Jefferson identified Bacon, Locke, and Newton as "the three greatest men that have ever lived, without any exception". Their works in the physical and moral sciences were instrumental in Jefferson's education and world view.
  29. ^ Jefferson, Thomas. "The Letters: 1743–1826 Bacon, Locke, and Newton". Archived from the original on 31 December 2009. Retrieved 13 June 2009. Bacon, Locke and Newton, whose pictures I will trouble you to have copied for me: and as I consider them as the three greatest men that have ever lived, without any exception, and as having laid the foundation of those superstructures which have been raised in the Physical & Moral sciences.
  30. ^ "Jefferson called Bacon, Newton, and Locke, who had so indelibly shaped his ideas, 'my trinity of the three greatest men the world had ever produced'". Explorer. Monticello. Archived from the original on 12 November 2012. Retrieved 28 August 2012.
  31. ^ Seigel, Jerrold (2005). The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. ^ Taylor, Charles (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  33. ^ Schultz, Duane P. (2008). A History of Modern Psychology (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomas Higher Education. pp. 47–48. ISBN 978-0-495-09799-0.
  34. ^ Wright, Edmund, ed. (2006). The Desk Encyclopedia of World History. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 374. ISBN 978-0-7394-7809-7.
  35. ^ McGrath, Alister (1998). Historical Theology, An Introduction to the History of Christian Thought. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. pp. 214–215.
  36. ^ a b c Heussi 1956.
  37. ^ Olmstead 1960, p. 18.
  38. ^ Stahl, H. (1957). "Baptisten". Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (in German). 3 (1). col. 863.
  39. ^ Halbrooks, G. Thomas; Erich Geldbach; Bill J. Leonard; Brian Stanley (2011). "Baptists". Religion Past and Present. doi:10.1163/1877-5888_rpp_COM_01472. ISBN 978-90-04-14666-2. Archived from the original on 9 February 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2020..
  40. ^ Olmstead 1960, pp. 102–105.
  41. ^ Olmstead 1960, p. 5.
  42. ^ Cohen, Martin (2008), Philosophical Tales, Blackwell, p. 101.
  43. ^ Tully, James (2007), An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts, New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 128, ISBN 978-0-521-43638-0
  44. ^ Farr, J. (1986). "I. 'So Vile and Miserable an Estate': The Problem of Slavery in Locke's Political Thought". Political Theory. 14 (2): 263–289. doi:10.1177/0090591786014002005. JSTOR 191463. S2CID 145020766..
  45. ^ Farr, J. (2008). "Locke, Natural Law, and New World Slavery". Political Theory. 36 (4): 495–522. doi:10.1177/0090591708317899. S2CID 159542780..
  46. ^ Brewer 2017, p. 1052.
  47. ^ Brewer 2017, pp. 1053–1054.
  48. ^ Brewer 2017, pp. 1066 & 1072.
  49. ^ Diamond, J., The World Before Yesterday
  50. ^ Thompson, E. P. (1968). The Making of the English Working Class. Penguin.
  51. ^ a b c Locke, John (1997a). "An Essay on the Poor Law". In Mark Goldie (ed.). Locke: Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. ^ Locke, John. [1690] 2017. Second Treatise of Government Archived 16 November 2019 at the Wayback Machine (10th ed.), digitized by D. Gowan. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  53. ^ Zuckert, Michael (1996), The Natural Rights Republic, Notre Dame University Press, pp. 73–85
  54. ^ Wills, Garry (2002), Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co
  55. ^ Skinner, Quentin, Visions of Politics, Cambridge.
  56. ^ Locke, John (2009), Two Treatises on Government: A Translation into Modern English, Industrial Systems Research, p. 81, ISBN 978-0-906321-47-8
  57. ^ "John Locke: Inequality is inevitable and necessary". Department of Philosophy The University of Hong Kong. Archived from the original (MS PowerPoint) on 9 May 2009. Retrieved 1 September 2011.
  58. ^ Locke, John. "Second Treatise". The Founders Constitution. §§ 25–51, 123–126. Archived from the original on 11 September 2011. Retrieved 1 September 2011.
  59. ^ Cliff, Cobb; Foldvary, Fred. "John Locke on Property". The School of Cooperative Individualism. Archived from the original on 15 March 2012. Retrieved 14 October 2012.
  60. ^ Locke, John (1691), Some Considerations on the consequences of the Lowering of Interest and the Raising of the Value of Money, Marxists, archived from the original on 24 March 2015, retrieved 4 July 2007.
  61. ^ "Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest, and Raising the Value of Money (Diplomatic)". www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  62. ^ a b Vaughn, Karen (1978). "John Locke and the Labor Theory of Value" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 2 (4): 311–326. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2011.
  63. ^ Engle, Eric (15 September 2008). "Karl Marx's Intellectual Roots in John Locke". Postmodern Openings. 7 (7). Rochester, NY: 35–36. SSRN 1268545 – via SSRN.
  64. ^ Locke 1997b, p. 307.
  65. ^ Locke 1997b, p. 306.
  66. ^ The American International Encyclopedia, vol. 9, New York: JJ Little Co, 1954.
  67. ^ Angus, Joseph (1880). The Handbook of Specimens of English Literature. London: William Clowes and Sons. p. 324.
  68. ^ "Clarke [née Jepp], Mary". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/66720. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  69. ^ a b Locke 1996, p. 10.
  70. ^ Locke 1997b, p. 357.
  71. ^ "Dreaming, Philosophy of – Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". utm.edu. Archived from the original on 31 January 2022. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  72. ^ Forster, Greg (2005), John Locke's politics of moral consensus.
  73. ^ Parker, Kim Ian (2004), The Biblical Politics of John Locke, Canadian Corporation for Studies in Religion.
  74. ^ Locke, John (2002), Nuovo, Victor (ed.), Writings on religion, Oxford{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  75. ^ a b Marshall, John (1994), John Locke: resistance, religion and responsibility, Cambridge, p. 426{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
  76. ^ Wainwright, Arthur W., ed. (1987). The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke: A Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistle of St. Paul to the Galatians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Romans, Ephesians. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 806. ISBN 978-0-19-824806-4.
  77. ^ Waldron 2002, pp. 27, 223.
  78. ^ Nelson 2019, pp. 7–8.
  79. ^ Waldron 2002, p. 145.
  80. ^ Henrich, D (1960), "Locke, John", Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (in German), 3. Auflage, Band IV, Spalte 426
  81. ^ Waldron 2002, pp. 217 ff.
  82. ^ a b Waldron 2002, p. 13.
  83. ^ Dunn, John (1969), The Political Thought of John Locke: A Historical Account of the Argument of the 'Two Treatises of Government', Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 99, [The Two Treatises of Government are] saturated with Christian assumptions..
  84. ^ Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1994. "John Locke's Epistemological Piety: Reason Is The Candle Of The Lord Archived 22 May 2020 at the Wayback Machine." Faith and Philosophy 11(4):572–591.
  85. ^ Waldron 2002, p. 142.
  86. ^ Elze, M (1958), "Grotius, Hugo", Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (in German) 2(3):1885–1886.
  87. ^ Hohlwein, H (1961), "Pufendorf, Samuel Freiherr von", Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (in German), 5(3):721.
  88. ^ Waldron 2002, p. 12.
  89. ^ Waldron 2002, pp. 22–43, 45–46, 101, 153–158, 195, 197.
  90. ^ Waldron 2002, pp. 21–43.
  91. ^ Waldron 2002, p. 136.
  92. ^ Locke, John (1947). Two Treatises of Government. New York: Hafner Publishing Company. pp. 17–18, 35, 38.
  93. ^ Becker, Carl. The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas. 1970 [1922]. Google Book Search. Revised ed., New York: Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-394-70060-1.
  94. ^ Harrison, John; Laslett, Peter (1971). The Library of John Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 1.
  95. ^ a b c d Quoted in Harrison, John; Laslett, Peter (1971). The Library of John Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 8.
  96. ^ Harrison, John; Laslett, Peter (1971). The Library of John Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 57–61.
  97. ^ a b c d Bodleian Library. "Rare Books Named Collections". Archived from the original on 22 April 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
  98. ^ Harrison, John; Laslett, Peter (1971). The Library of John Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 20.
  99. ^ Harrison, John; Laslett, Peter (1971). The Library of John Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 18.
  100. ^ a b c d e Clapinson, M, and TD Rogers. 1991. Summary Catalogue of Post-Medieval Western Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library, Oxford. Vol. 2. Oxford University Press.
  101. ^ The works of Robert Boyle, vol. 12. Edited by Michael Hunter and Edward B. Davis. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2000, pp. xviii–xxi.
  102. ^ James Farr and Clayton Robers. "John Locke on the Glorious Revolution: a Rediscovered Document" Historical Journal 28 (1985): 395–398.
  103. ^ Richard Yeo, Notebooks, English Virtuosi (University of Chicago Press, 2014), 183.
  104. ^ John Locke, The Educational Writings of John Locke, ed. James Axtell (Cambridge University Press, 1968), 421.
  105. ^ Richard Yeo, Notebooks, English Virtuosi (University of Chicago Press, 2014), 218.
  106. ^ G. G. Meynell, "John Locke's Method of Common-Placing, as seen in His Drafts and His Medical Notebooks, Bodleian MSS Locke d. 9, f. 21 and f. 23," The Seventeenth Century 8, no. 2 (1993): 248.
  107. ^ Michael Stolberg, "John Locke's 'New Method of Making Common-Place-Books': Tradition, Innovation and Epistemic Effects," Early Science and Medicine 19, no. 5 (2014): 448–470.
  108. ^ John Locke, A New Method of Making Common-Place-Books (London: Printed for J. Greenood, 1706), 4.
  109. ^ G. G. Meynell, "A Database for John Locke's Medical Notebooks and Medical Reading," Medical History 42 (1997): 478
  110. ^ "The manuscripts, Letter from Andrew Millar to Thomas Cadell, 16 July, 1765. University of Edinburgh". www.millar-project.ed.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 15 January 2016. Retrieved 2 June 2016.
  111. ^ Locke, John. [1664] 1990. Questions Concerning the Law of Nature (definitive Latin text), translated by R. Horwitz, et al. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Sources

  • Ashcraft, Richard, 1986. Revolutionary Politics & Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Discusses the relationship between Locke's philosophy and his political activities.
  • Ayers, Michael, 1991. Locke. Epistemology & Ontology Routledge (the standard work on Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding.)
  • Bailyn, Bernard, 1992 (1967). The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Harvard Uni. Press. Discusses the influence of Locke and other thinkers upon the American Revolution and on subsequent American political thought.
  • Brewer, Holly (October 2017). "Slavery, Sovereignty, and "Inheritable Blood": Reconsidering John Locke and the Origins of American Slavery". American Historical Review. 122 (4): 1038–1078. doi:10.1093/ahr/122.4.1038.
  • Cohen, Gerald, 1995. 'Marx and Locke on Land and Labour', in his Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality, Oxford University Press.
  • Cox, Richard, Locke on War and Peace, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960. A discussion of Locke's theory of international relations.
  • Chappell, Vere, ed., 1994. The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Cambridge U.P. excerpt and text search Archived 29 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  • Dunn, John, 1984. Locke. Oxford Uni. Press. A succinct introduction.
  • ———, 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the "Two Treatises of Government". Cambridge Uni. Press. Introduced the interpretation which emphasises the theological element in Locke's political thought.
  • Heussi, Karl (1956), Kompendium der Kirchengeschichte (in German), Tübingen, DE{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  • Hudson, Nicholas, "John Locke and the Tradition of Nominalism," in: Nominalism and Literary Discourse, ed. Hugo Keiper, Christoph Bode, and Richard Utz (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997), pp. 283–299.
  • Laslett, Peter (1988), Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press to Locke's Two Treatises of Government
  • Locke, John (1996), Grant, Ruth W; Tarcov, Nathan (eds.), Some Thoughts Concerning Education and of the Conduct of the Understanding, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co, p. 10
  • Locke, John (1997b), Woolhouse, Roger (ed.), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, New York: Penguin Books
  • Locke Studies, appearing annually from 2001, formerly The Locke Newsletter (1970–2000), publishes scholarly work on John Locke.
  • Macpherson, C.B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962). Establishes the deep affinity from Hobbes to Harrington, the Levellers, and Locke through to nineteenth-century utilitarianism.
  • Nelson, Eric (2019). The Theology of Liberalism: Political Philosophy and the Justice of God. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-24094-0. Archived from the original on 2 August 2020. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
  • Olmstead, Clifton E (1960), History of Religion in the United States, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  • Tully, James, 1980. A Discourse on Property : John Locke and his Adversaries. Cambridge Uni. Press
  • Waldron, Jeremy (2002), God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-89057-1
  • Yolton, John W., ed., 1969. John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge Uni. Press.
  • Yolton, John W., ed., 1993. A Locke Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Zuckert, Michael, Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

This content is from Wikipedia. GradeSaver is providing this content as a courtesy until we can offer a professionally written study guide by one of our staff editors. We do not consider this content professional or citable. Please use your discretion when relying on it.