- Collette, Carolyn P. (2001). Species, phantasms, and images: vision and medieval psychology in The Canterbury tales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.16499. ISBN 978-0-472-11161-9.
- Kolve, V.A.; Olson, Glending (2005). The Canterbury tales: fifteen tales and the general prologue: authoritative text, sources and backgrounds, criticism. A Norton critical edition (2 ed.). New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-92587-6.
- Sobecki, Sebastian (2017). "A Southwark Tale: Gower, the 1381 Poll Tax, and Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales" (PDF). Speculum. 92 (3): 630–60. doi:10.1086/692620. S2CID 159994357.
- Thompson, N.S. (1996). Chaucer, Boccaccio, and the debate of love: a comparative study of the Decameron and the Canterbury tales. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-812378-1.
- Spark Notes: The Canterbury Tales. New York: Spark Publishing. 2014.
- No Fair: The Canterbury Tales. New York: Spark Publishing. 2009.
- Dogan, Sandeur (June 2013). "The Three Estates Model: Represented and Satirised in Chaucer's General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales". Journal of History, Culture & Art Research. 2 (2): 49–56. doi:10.7596/taksad.v2i2.229. hdl:11511/51091.
- Nicholls, Jonathan. "Review: Chaucer's Narrators by David Lawton", The Modern Language Review,2017.
- Pugh, Tison. "Gender, Vulgarity, and the Phantom Debates of Chaucer's Merchant's Tale", Studies in Philology, Vol. 114 Issue 3, 473–96, 2017.
This content is from Wikipedia. GradeSaver is providing this content as a courtesy until we can offer a professionally written study guide by one of our staff editors. We do not consider this content professional or citable. Please use your discretion when relying on it.
