Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead Sources and ClassicNote Author

  • Tom Stoppard. Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead. New York: Grove Press, Inc., 1968.
  • Brassell, Tim. Tom Stoppard: An Assessment. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1985.
  • Haymen, Ronald. Tom Stoppard. Londan: Heinemann, 1977.
  • Kelly, Katherine E., ed.. The Cambridge Companion to Tom Stoppard. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • Barnes, Clive. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." The New York Times 17 October 1967: 53. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 393.

  • Barnes, Clive. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." The New York Times 19 October 1970: 39. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 396.

  • Berlin, Normand. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead: Thater of Criticism." Modern Drama Vol.XVI. Nos. 3&4 December 1973: 269-77. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 396-400.

  • Brand, Gerhard. "Stoppard. Tom." Critical Survey of Drama.Ed. Carl Rollyson. Vol. 6. Pasadena: Salem Press Inc., 2003.

  • Draudt, Manfred. " 'Two Sides of the Same Coin, or...the same Side of Two Coins': An Analysis of Tom Stoppard's 'Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead,'." English Studies Vol.62. No. 4. August 1981: 348-357. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 412-415.

  • Duncan, Joseph E.. "Godot Comes: 'Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Ariel: A Review of International English Literature Vol.12. No. 4. October 1981: 57-70. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 415-418.

  • Huston, J. Dennis. "'Misreading' 'Hamlet': Problems of Perspective in 'Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead'." Tom Stoppard: A Casebook Ed. John Harty III. Garland Publishing, Inc: 1988. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 422-426.

  • Kerr, Walter. "Taking Revenge in Life." The New York Times 29 October 1967: 1,3. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 394-395.

  • Perlette, John M. "Theatre at the Limit: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Modern Drama Vol.XXVIII. No. 4. December 1985: 659-669. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 418-422.

  • Gordon, Giles. Interview with Tom Stoppard. The Transatlantic Review No. 29. Summer 1968: 17-25. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 395-396.

  • Sundstrand, David. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Masterplots. Ed. Frank N Magill. Vol 10. Pasedena: Salem Press Inc., 1996.

  • Weightman, John. "Mini-Hamlets in Limbo," Encounter Vol. XXIX. No. 1. July 1967: 38-40. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz. Vol. 63. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991. 391-393.

  • "Spinoffs." 2006-06-26. <http://www.tk421.net/hamlet/hamlet.html#spinoffs>.
  • "Performances, adaptations, influences and references." 2005-06-26. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet#Performances.2C_adaptations.2C_influences_and_references>.