12 Angry Men

In act 2, jurors two and four discuss their understanding of 'reasonable doubt' . Do they believe homicide cases should have a ruling of 'reasonable doubt'? Why/why not?

In act 2, jurors two and four discuss their understanding of 'reasonable doubt' . Do they believe homicide cases should have a ruling of 'reasonable doubt'? Why/why not?

Asked by
Last updated by jill d #170087
Answers 1
Add Yours

I do not see a conversation between the second and fourth jurors in Act II. Possibly, I am looking at a different text. I'll check it out further and get back to you.