Anatomy & Physiology: The Unity of Form and Function, 7th Edition

Published by McGraw-Hill Education
ISBN 10: 0073403717
ISBN 13: 978-0-07340-371-7

Chapter 1 - Section 1.3 - Scientific Method - Apply What You Know - Page 7: 1

Answer

The key difference between the ancient belief that gods or invisible demons caused epilepsy and the modern scientific explanation involving abnormal electrical activity in nerve cells of the brain lies in their falsifiability and testability. Here's an explanation of why one is falsifiable (scientific) while the other is not: 1. **Scientific Explanation (Modern):** - **Falsifiability:** The modern scientific explanation that attributes epileptic seizures to bursts of abnormal electrical activity in nerve cells of the brain is falsifiable. This means that it can be tested and potentially proven false through empirical observation and experimentation. Scientists can conduct various tests, such as EEG (electroencephalogram) scans, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans, and neurological examinations, to gather data about the brain's electrical activity during seizures. If the collected evidence contradicts the hypothesis that abnormal electrical activity causes epilepsy, the hypothesis can be rejected or modified. - **Testability:** Scientific explanations are based on testable hypotheses that can be subjected to experimentation, observation, and data collection. This allows for ongoing refinement and adjustment of the scientific understanding as new evidence becomes available. In the case of epilepsy, ongoing research continually tests and refines the understanding of its causes and mechanisms. 2. **Ancient Belief (Non-Scientific):** - **Lack of Falsifiability:** The ancient belief that gods or invisible demons caused epilepsy lacks falsifiability. It is not based on empirical evidence, measurable data, or testable hypotheses. Since it relies on supernatural or unobservable entities (gods or demons) as the causes, there is no way to disprove or test this belief using the scientific method. - **Non-Testable:** Claims involving gods, spirits, or supernatural beings are not subject to empirical testing because they exist outside the realm of the natural world, which is the domain of scientific inquiry. As such, they are not amenable to the scientific method, which relies on empirical evidence and natural explanations. In summary, the modern scientific explanation of epilepsy is considered scientific because it is falsifiable and testable through empirical observation and experimentation. It is based on naturalistic principles and can be refined or revised based on new evidence. In contrast, the ancient belief in gods or invisible demons causing epilepsy is not scientific because it lacks falsifiability and cannot be subjected to empirical testing. It relies on supernatural explanations that fall outside the scope of scientific inquiry, making it unverifiable or untestable by scientific standards.

Work Step by Step

The key difference between the ancient belief that gods or invisible demons caused epilepsy and the modern scientific explanation involving abnormal electrical activity in nerve cells of the brain lies in their falsifiability and testability. Here's an explanation of why one is falsifiable (scientific) while the other is not: 1. **Scientific Explanation (Modern):** - **Falsifiability:** The modern scientific explanation that attributes epileptic seizures to bursts of abnormal electrical activity in nerve cells of the brain is falsifiable. This means that it can be tested and potentially proven false through empirical observation and experimentation. Scientists can conduct various tests, such as EEG (electroencephalogram) scans, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans, and neurological examinations, to gather data about the brain's electrical activity during seizures. If the collected evidence contradicts the hypothesis that abnormal electrical activity causes epilepsy, the hypothesis can be rejected or modified. - **Testability:** Scientific explanations are based on testable hypotheses that can be subjected to experimentation, observation, and data collection. This allows for ongoing refinement and adjustment of the scientific understanding as new evidence becomes available. In the case of epilepsy, ongoing research continually tests and refines the understanding of its causes and mechanisms. 2. **Ancient Belief (Non-Scientific):** - **Lack of Falsifiability:** The ancient belief that gods or invisible demons caused epilepsy lacks falsifiability. It is not based on empirical evidence, measurable data, or testable hypotheses. Since it relies on supernatural or unobservable entities (gods or demons) as the causes, there is no way to disprove or test this belief using the scientific method. - **Non-Testable:** Claims involving gods, spirits, or supernatural beings are not subject to empirical testing because they exist outside the realm of the natural world, which is the domain of scientific inquiry. As such, they are not amenable to the scientific method, which relies on empirical evidence and natural explanations. In summary, the modern scientific explanation of epilepsy is considered scientific because it is falsifiable and testable through empirical observation and experimentation. It is based on naturalistic principles and can be refined or revised based on new evidence. In contrast, the ancient belief in gods or invisible demons causing epilepsy is not scientific because it lacks falsifiability and cannot be subjected to empirical testing. It relies on supernatural explanations that fall outside the scope of scientific inquiry, making it unverifiable or untestable by scientific standards.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.