Discrete Mathematics with Applications 4th Edition

Published by Cengage Learning
ISBN 10: 0-49539-132-8
ISBN 13: 978-0-49539-132-6

Chapter 2 - The Logic of Compound Statements - Exercise Set 2.3 - Page 62: 19

Answer

It has been verified that (p ∨ q) v (∼p) → q

Work Step by Step

p ∨ q ∼p ∴ q The green row describes the only situation in which both the premises are true. Because the conclusion is also true here, the argument form is valid.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.