Summa Theologica

Structure

The Summa is composed of three major parts, each of which deals with a major subsection of Christian theology.

  • First Part (in Latin, Prima Pars): God's existence and nature; the creation of the world; angels; the nature of man
  • Second Part:
  • First part of the Second Part (Prima Secundae, often abbreviated Part I-II): general principles of morality (including a theory of law)
  • Second part of the Second Part (Secunda Secundae, or Part II-II): morality in particular, including individual virtues and vices
  • Third Part (Tertia Pars): the person and work of Christ, who is the way of man to God; the sacraments; the end of the world. Aquinas left this part unfinished.[5]

Each part contains several questions, each of which revolves around a more specific subtopic; one such question is "Of Christ's Manner of Life."[6] Each question contains several articles phrased as interrogative statements dealing with specific issues, such as "Whether Christ should have led a life of poverty in this world?"[7] The Summa has a standard format for each article.

  • A series of objections to the (yet to be stated) conclusion are given; one such objection, for example, is that "Christ should have embraced the most eligible form of life...which is a mean between riches and poverty."[7] Note that this said conclusion can mostly (but not without exception) be extracted by setting the introduction to the first objection into the negative, thus, St. Thomas begins here "It would seem that Christ should not have led a life of poverty in this world", and his thesis in the end is "Christ should have led a life of poverty in this world" (or to be more precise in today's language, "That Christ lived, as he actually did, a life of poverty in this world was fittingly done so").
  • A short counter-statement, beginning with the phrase sed contra ("on the contrary"), is then given; this statement almost always references authoritative literature, such as the Bible, Aristotle, or the Church Fathers.[8]
  • The actual argument is then made; this is generally a clarification of the issue. For example, Aquinas states that "it was fitting for Christ to lead a life of poverty in this world" for four distinct reasons, each of which is expounded in some detail.[7]
  • Individual replies to the preceding objections are then given, if necessary. These replies range from one sentence to several paragraphs in length. Aquinas's reply to the above objection is that "those who wish to live virtuously need to avoid abundance of riches and beggary, ...but voluntary poverty is not open to this danger: and such was the poverty chosen by Christ."[7]

This method of exposition is derived from Averroes,[9] to whom Aquinas refers respectfully as "the Commentator".


This content is from Wikipedia. GradeSaver is providing this content as a courtesy until we can offer a professionally written study guide by one of our staff editors. We do not consider this content professional or citable. Please use your discretion when relying on it.