Planet of the Apes Literary Elements

Planet of the Apes Literary Elements

Director

Franklin J. Schaffner

Leading Actors/Actresses

Charlton Heston/Roddy McDowall/Kim Hunter

Supporting Actors/Actresses

Maurice Evans/Linda Harrison

Genre

Science Fiction

Language

English

Awards

Special Academy Award for Makeup prior to Makeup becoming a regular category

Date of Release

April 3, 1968

Producer

Arthur P. Jacobs

Setting and Context

Earth in the year 3978

Narrator and Point of View

The film is primarily seen through the experiences of astronaut George “Bright Eyes” Taylor, although without a direct servicing of his misanthropic outlook upon humanity.

Tone and Mood

The film goes through a subtle tonal shift in which the mood gradually moves from one of dizzying vertiginous unease with a world that seems completely upside down to one of dawning recognition that the world is eerily familiar to one of shocking recognition that this world is and always has been our own.

Protagonist and Antagonist

Protagonist: Taylor. Antagonist: Dr. Zaius.

Major Conflict

Taylor and Dr. Zaius are locked in a conflict over Taylor discovering his destiny. Zaius is acutely aware that Taylor is from the past and what happened in that past. His primary job among the apes seems to be to keep them from realizing that they evolved from a civilization in which man ruled them and was their intellectual superior. While Taylor never seem to suspect for a moment that he has not traveled through space nearly as far as he has traveled through time, he does make a series of references about this planet being upside down from what he knows. Therefore, his side of the conflict is not so much about searching for destiny as having it suddenly thrust in front of him in a way that makes him question everything he thought he knew.

Climax

Taylor seeing that the head of the Statue of Liberty and realizing he’s been back home on earth the entire time.

Foreshadowing

"Does man, that marvel of the universe, that glorious paradox who sent me to the stars…still make war against his brother?” Taylor's ponderous question posed to the spaceship's onboard computer diary in the opening scene.

Understatement

The revelation that Taylor has simply returned to earth after floating for thousands of light years is a classic case of understatement. Thousands of years of history is explained with just a very brief appearance of half of an iconic statue.

Innovations in Filming or Lighting or Camera Techniques

So innovative was the makeup for the film that a special honorary Oscar was decreed since, rather shockingly, no award for makeup existed at the time. In addition, while there is some debate over the precise and irrefutable truth of the claim, many have forwarded the proposition that the soundtrack for the film was the first atonal score in Hollywood history.

Allusions

The most famous allusion in the film is the recreation of the pictorial maxim of the See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil statue.

Paradox

Taylor considers himself to be at the top of the hierarchy of human beings. He even goes so far as to assert that he became an astronaut in order to prove that there had to be something out there better than the human species. This utterly misanthropic man whose view of humans is roughly coincident with that of seeing them as mere beasts, however, somehow has the nerve to complain that being treated like an animal by intelligent apes is like living in a madhouse. There is most definitely something paradoxical about that irony.

Parallelism

The entire film engages a cosmological concept of parallelism by constantly paralleling ape society with human society for the purpose of satire. Common human tropes like “monkey-see/monkey-do” becomes “human-see/human-do” and “all humans look the same to apes” are engaged to reveal that human and ape societies are not really all that different.

Update this section!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this section.

Update this section

After you claim a section you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.