12 Angry Men

Why was the boy found not guilty in 12 angry men

what evidence proved , what was the constitutional principles

Asked by
Last updated by Aslan
Answers 1
Add Yours

The testimony of the witnesses was flawed. The old man was hard of hearing and could not move as fast as the prosecution claimed. The lady near the L train had vision problems and could not see what she thinks she saw in so much detail. The knife was not unique and, as juror 8 reveals, can be purchased at any corner store.