I'm doing an online assignment on 12 angry men, and one of the questions is "How does juror #3 contradicted himself?" I would greatly appreciate it if someone could help me answer this.
Answers 1Add Yours
Answered by Aslan
Juror 3 contradicts himself by using specifics when it strengthens his case, proving the defendant to be guilty "he said 20 seconds", while speaking in generalizations when it does not help his case, "how does he know how long 15 seconds is?"