Could jurors #4 and #10 quality as a "villain"?

I don't see #4 as a villain. 4th Juror is a stockbroker. He wears glasses and seems to handle himself with a very serious air. He deals with the facts of the case logically and concretely. Juror #10 can be seen as a villain. His racism and personal bias is hard to miss. He is one of the most fervent attackers of the defendant. Tactless and fairly bigoted, he condemns the defendant as “one of them” right from the start.